
“What they do not embody are temperaments that make them suited to keeping a Ruger® or Smith and Wesson® loaded in their classrooms, their second homes. Mastriano courting voters on Gab pushes the GOP further right, experts say All but a few of them proved themselves to be skilled instructors, devoted public servants, solid citizens, and fine people. “I spent half of my life in a public school classroom and have come to know scores of other teachers.

allow school personnel to have access to firearms in school safety zones if school districts establish proper guidelines and they are licensed to carry a concealed firearm and have met certain training requirements in the use and handling of firearms.”Īt that time I noted, “I speak as a teacher, a father, a grandfather, and a gun owner - but not a member of the demagogic NRA –when I say this is a hare-brained proposition. Don White has proffered Senate Bill 1193 which would, according to White’s website, “. It was a dunderheaded idea back in 2014, when I first wrote about such a proposal, and it is just as doltish today. Whenever the issue of school safety arises, some politicians who are so far right on the ideological spectrum that they have left reality propose arming teachers.

INSANITY MAX 30 WORKOUTS ONLINE LICENSE
“School employees with a license to carry a firearm would be permitted to carry a weapon at work under legislation introduced on late last week by state senator and Republican gubernatorial hopeful Doug Mastriano,” PennLive reporter Jan Murphy wrote.

“Mastriano calls for arming school employees to protect kids” blazed the headline of an article I encountered as I was perusing my morning news sites earlier this week. Neither option is particularly appealing to those on the outside looking in, and no one is envious of the decision the Lakers have to make.Įven from the inside looking out, all you can do is just sigh.įor more Lakers talk, subscribe to the Silver Screen and Roll podcast feed on iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher or Google Podcasts. The Lakers are now stuck between the proverbial rock and a hard place. The Lakers are the latest among them as Westbrook hit a new low last season, with his play dropping off a cliff and his self-awareness of the situation being non-existent. He’s been passed around the league with each franchise more than happy to part ways with him after a season. None of that is true about Westbrook, though. When it’s working, he’s nearly worth the headache.

He’s one of the very best guards of his generation. Kyrie has torpedoed each of the last two franchises he’s been part of in Boston and Brooklyn, and that came after jumping ship from a LeBron-led team that was a title contender, even if it’s something he seems to regret.Īnd yet, teams keep taking a chance on him because he’s a remarkable player when he does take the court. While there is a right and wrong choice for the Lakers specifically when it comes to choosing Westbrook or Kyrie, to those outside of the Lakers’ sphere, both answers are bad. In his latest newsletter, Dan Woike of the LA Times shared an incredibly hilarious and honest response from an NBA GM (emphasis mine):īut this situation is far from perfect, the Lakers forced to try and figure out if they can get good enough fast enough in a deal instead of waiting for the in-season trade deadline or the end of the season to deal with their Westbrook issues.Īsked what he’d do in their situation, one rival general manager just sighed. And executives around the league share that view of the situation. At least with Irving, the on-court impact can alleviate some of the stresses of the off-court drama.īut still, ultimately, desiring all the baggage that comes with Kyrie is basically insanity. Perhaps the biggest indictment of the Russell Westbrook situation is that Kyrie feels like a massive upgrade, both on and off the court. For 99% of teams and franchises in the league, welcoming in Kyrie Irving and the general nonsense that comes with him is wholly undesirable.
